Monday, July 6, 2009
GM Bankruptcy Sale Appeals are filed
Sunday, July 5, 2009
GM asset sale approved late Sunday
"It is unclear whether creditors who objected to the sale will appeal, as happened in Chrysler's case, where the objectors' appeal went all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court, which declined to hear the case."
See the entire article here:
http://www.detroitnews.com/article/20090706/AUTO01/907060362/GM-asset-sale-approved-late-Sunday
GM 363 Sale Approved 7/5/09
Thursday, July 2, 2009
GM Recovery Plan Rests With Judge
Mr. Richman said U.S. control over GM made the company's bankruptcy "a historic first attempt at a Chapter 11 nationalization."
See the entire article:
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124654496390486149.html
GM's bondholders: Let's 'negotiate fairly'
Michael Richman, an attorney from the firm Patton Boggs representing a group of dissident bondholders addressed the judge about "the absence of real choice in the dominance of the government," referring to the U.S. Treasury's role in pushing the bankruptcy process forward.
He said that the Treasury, in imposing it's July 10 "drop dead deadline" was using a "my way or the highway" attitude in refusing to consider alternate means of restructuring.
Dissenting bondholders argue against GM asset sale
See the entire story here:
http://money.cnn.com/news/newsfeeds/articles/reuters/MTFH98548_2009-07-02_15-14-44_N0245292.htm
Wednesday, July 1, 2009
U.S. government won't fund GM after July 10, official says
GM bankruptcy wrangling in 2nd day
Wilson said that one of the "strategic benefits" of a 363 sale, in which the preferred assets of the old GM are transferred to the new GM, is that "consent of bondholders was not required."
Tuesday, June 30, 2009
The GM Bankruptcy and the Supreme Court
See the entire article at:
http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/06/the_gm_bankruptcy_and_the_supr.html
Monday, June 29, 2009
June 30 Hearing- List of Objectors is 108 pages
http://gmcourtdocs.gardencitygroup.com/pdflib/2756_50026.pdf
You know what they say for every ten folks that complaint there are 10 that say nothing! Should be interesting. To see if your name is on the objections list, bring up the document, then search by name. I'm there! My 12 page objection was duly given a document number.
Michael Richman of Patton Boggs Audio, June 26
Saturday, June 27, 2009
F and D Committee to Depose GM CEO Henderson
Defiant small GM bondholders vow to carry on the fight
By Nicole Bullock
Published: June 27 2009 03:00 Last updated: June 27 2009 03:00
This weekend, Oliver Addison Parker will board a plane from Fort Lauderdale to New York. Mr Parker, a trial lawyer and General Motors bondholder, is en route to hearings on the company's restructuring to argue his case himself in federal bankruptcy court.
The issue highlights the difficulty individual bondholders face when competing against larger, better connected groups. Top lawyers for GM and the unsecured creditors' committee charge rates of more than $900 an hour.
The high fees and the difficulty of mobilising opposition mean that individuals, including the dealers, have gained publicity and sympathy on Capitol Hill but not so much in bankruptcy court.
The small bondholders, undaunted, intend to continue their challenge. The unofficial committee has been gathering donations through a website to pay legal costs. Michael Richman of Patton Boggs is representing them. They will argue that the fast-track sale is unjustified and push for a traditional Chapter 11 reorganisation, which they believe will give them more balanced treatment with the unions.
"We have enough to fund [the case] through our objections and we are working on funding it beyond that," says Mark Modica, a manager at a Saturn dealership. "We're still in a fight."
Thursday, June 25, 2009
GM Update: Dissident Bondholders Not Backing Down
GM Update: Dissident Bondholders Not Backing Down
"Richman will get his chance to question the sales plan starting Tuesday (June 30), when GM and its legal team at Weil, Gotshal & Manges call a number of high-powered executives, including former GM chief executive Fritz Henderson, to the witness stand to testify in favor of the proposed sales plan. Richman say he plans to question them aggressively about the plan."
Tuesday, June 23, 2009
Judge denies GM bondholder group committee request
In bankruptcy cases, official committees can have their fees paid for by the bankrupt company rather than having to come up with the money themselves.
The group's lawyer, Michael Richman, of the Patton Boggs law firm, argued that an official committee was necessary because his clients -- many of them retirees and individual families -- had limited means and that the bondholders were a large disparate group.
"Some people think we are insane to be standing in the way of this process, but this is about adequate representation," Richman told the court.
Richman told reporters after the hearing it was "likely" his clients would continue to object to GM's fast track sale, but he was unsure what they would be able to do given their spending limits. Richman said he was planning to meet the official committee of unsecured creditors to see if they would adopt any of the objections his group has raised.
www.reuters.com/article/governmentFilingsNews/idUSN238817420090623
See Also: Judge Shoots Down Plea for Extra GM Bondholders Committee
After the hearing, Richman said he will likely press on with the bondholders' objection to the sales plan, but that he's not sure how the bondholders will pay for continued high quality legal representation. "It's a challenge of resources," he says.
http://amlawdaily.typepad.com/amlawdaily/2009/06/judge-rejects.html
Monday, June 22, 2009
Late Objection Filing Notification
What can you do--write to:
The Honorable Robert E. Gerber
Case No. 09-50026 (REG)
Phone: 212-668-2870
Fax: 212-668-3357
I just spoke with the bankruptcy court, you can still send your objections; include a cover letter indicating your notification was late.
Friday, June 19, 2009
GM Restructuring Meets Opposition
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124544333400432269.html
NEW YORK (AP) — A group of General Motors Corp. bondholders and some of the automaker's labor unions filed objections Friday to GM's plan to sell its assets to a new company that can emerge from bankruptcy protection.
Their opposition, along with additional objections filed by consumer groups, a handful of states and cities, and individual retirees, shareholders and bondholders, threatens to put the brakes on what has so far been a speedy trip through the Chapter 11 process.
The Unofficial Committee of Family & Dissident GM Bondholders claim they are being treated unfairly compared with the automaker's other stakeholders and deserve more than the 10 percent stake in the new company that they would receive if the sale goes through.
In its motion, the bondholders group accused GM and the U.S. government of unjustly speeding the case through the bankruptcy process at the expense of the bondholders and dividing the new company's assets "among a few select favored classes." See the entire Associated Press article at:
http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5jDHyGHqjGfzLJa_eRhwViUGCwazgD98U128G0
Small Bondholder Attorneys file objections June 19
http://gmcourtdocs.gardencitygroup.com/pdflib/1969_50026.pdf
Interesting the next document filed, Doc. No. 1970, was filed by the U.S. Trustee objection to the motion that the "Unofficially Committee of Family and Dissident GM Bondholders" not be granted official status. GM and the government are fighting with all they have not to allow the small GM bondholders a voice. Hearing is June 23, 9:45 AM.
http://gmcourtdocs.gardencitygroup.com/pdflib/1970_50026.pdf
Mom and Pop trip up GM restruturing
GM had been doing a good job of neutralizing dissident bondholder groups until May, when the Main Street Bondholders Coalition, which advocates for the rights of GM's thousands of small bondholders, rejected the company's restructuring plan and began pressing Congress to get involved on behalf of individual investors. Additionally an unofficial committee calling themselves "family and dissident GM bondholders" on June 11 sought designation as a formal committee, arguing in a court filing that "there are significant questions about the economic realities" of GM's bankruptcy plan.
See the entire article at:
http://www.thedeal.com/dealscape/2009/06/gm_bondholders_dissidents_bank.php
Thursday, June 18, 2009
GM Attorney Wastes No Time in Fighting F andD Committee
http://gmcourtdocs.gardencitygroup.com/pdflib/1805_50026.pdf
In my humble opinion the debtor's arguments are weak and not of significant merit. They misconceive the principles of the law. ( I sound so legal). We shall see what the Honorable Judge Gerber has to say on Tuesday, June 23rd. I am guardedly optimistic the F and D GM Bondholders will become an Official Committee. That's just "speculation" of course and I could be incorrect. For the folks following this saga I hope you feel the sarcasm every time I use the word "speculate or speculation".